vMix Forums
»
General
»
OMT - Open Media Transport
»
OMT image quality is poorer than NDI?
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/14/2012(UTC) Posts: 325  Location: Finland Thanks: 205 times Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 17 post(s)
|
Claims from a hardware manufacturer:
1. NDI offers better image quality than OMT due to its lower compression and consequently higher bandwidth.
2. OMT and NDI have almost identical latency, belonging to the same level.
3. OMT is adjusted based on image quality, at the highest quality setting, for the same border ratio, OMT will have higher bandwidth than NDI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/27/2012(UTC) Posts: 5,512  Location: Belgium Thanks: 316 times Was thanked: 1021 time(s) in 838 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: jet  Claims from a hardware manufacturer:
1. NDI offers better image quality than OMT due to its lower compression and consequently higher bandwidth.
2. OMT and NDI have almost identical latency, belonging to the same level.
OMT is adjusted based on image quality, at the highest quality setting, for the same border ratio, OMT will have higher bandwidth than NDI. apples and pears: Open source Royalty free
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/14/2012(UTC) Posts: 325  Location: Finland Thanks: 205 times Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 17 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: jet  Claims from a hardware manufacturer:
1. NDI offers better image quality than OMT due to its lower compression and consequently higher bandwidth.
2. OMT and NDI have almost identical latency, belonging to the same level.
3. OMT is adjusted based on image quality, at the highest quality setting, for the same border ratio, OMT will have higher bandwidth than NDI. For me the bandwidth is not an issue as OMT is meant to be used on a local network so OMT should always output the best image quality possible. However it would be good thing to give users a "Custom bitrate" / "Compression level" -option to adjust the bitrate to their specific needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administrators
Joined: 1/13/2010(UTC) Posts: 5,315  Location: Gold Coast, Australia Was thanked: 4710 time(s) in 1614 post(s)
|
On the surface those claims do not make much sense, where did you see them?
I have seen some AI hallucinations making similar claims, so I would be curious to know what specific testing methodology (if any) the manufacturer used.
|
 1 user thanked admin for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/14/2012(UTC) Posts: 325  Location: Finland Thanks: 205 times Was thanked: 19 time(s) in 17 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: admin  On the surface those claims do not make much sense, where did you see them?
I have seen some AI hallucinations making similar claims, so I would be curious to know what specific testing methodology (if any) the manufacturer used. Yes, the answers from the manufacturer are a bit confusing and controversial... If we still get an answer from them we will ask.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vMix Forums
»
General
»
OMT - Open Media Transport
»
OMT image quality is poorer than NDI?
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
Important Information:
The vMix Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
More Details
Close