logo

Live Production Software Forums


Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
greggibson  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, April 12, 2022 5:36:19 AM(UTC)
greggibson

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/23/2020(UTC)
Posts: 137
United States
Location: Washington, DC

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Could we get an option to select "NONE" when right clicking an input to assign an NDI source. As it is now, if you mistakenly assign a source to the wrong input you either have to assign another source to it, keep the duplicate sources or delete the input and create a new one. Sometimes we just need to remove the assigned source and leave the input blank.
doggy  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, April 12, 2022 5:56:12 AM(UTC)
doggy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/27/2012(UTC)
Posts: 5,223
Belgium
Location: Belgium

Thanks: 293 times
Was thanked: 955 time(s) in 790 post(s)
does this then have to become a transparent input or black ? a running NDI Testpattern tool could give you the latter that would appear in the selections ( a transsparent ndi feed can be made with the NDI SDK)
greggibson  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, April 12, 2022 11:39:06 AM(UTC)
greggibson

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/23/2020(UTC)
Posts: 137
United States
Location: Washington, DC

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Originally Posted by: doggy Go to Quoted Post
does this then have to become a transparent input or black ? a running NDI Testpattern tool could give you the latter that would appear in the selections ( a transsparent ndi feed can be made with the NDI SDK)


Yes, thanks that's a reasonable work around but then you also have to run test pattern somewhere on the network. It would really make sense to just disconnect an input for all sources and make it blank (or Blancke :-) ).

I'd prefer the input just go black but honestly wouldn't care if there was just a left over freeze frame. It's better than running unnecessary or duplicate sources.
richardgatarski  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, April 12, 2022 4:05:59 PM(UTC)
richardgatarski

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/18/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,837
Location: Stockholm

Thanks: 144 times
Was thanked: 297 time(s) in 250 post(s)
+1
or better, a Black or None option (the latter meaning transparent).
pm  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, April 12, 2022 5:39:38 PM(UTC)
pm

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/28/2015(UTC)
Posts: 184

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 27 post(s)
+1
None means going to black or a picture with ndi logo.

Goal: The input stays an NDI input but doesn't use network bandwidth and processing power anymore.
richardgatarski  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, April 12, 2022 7:33:46 PM(UTC)
richardgatarski

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/18/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,837
Location: Stockholm

Thanks: 144 times
Was thanked: 297 time(s) in 250 post(s)
Originally Posted by: pm Go to Quoted Post
+1
None means going to black or a picture with ndi logo.

Goal: The input stays an NDI input but doesn't use network bandwidth and processing power anymore.

Agree with that goal. But. One use case for us with black specifically is to get something that can be used as a placeholder for Layers in other Inputs. I can imagine other cases where transparent would be preferred. Hence the addition with options for both Black and None/Transparent. And, I guess "Transparent" (as selectable in Colour Inputs) is more specific than "None".
Peter Berglund  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, April 12, 2022 10:42:35 PM(UTC)
Peter Berglund

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/9/2019(UTC)
Posts: 77
Man
Sweden
Location: Stockholm

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 4 post(s)
+1
mavik  
#8 Posted : Friday, April 22, 2022 4:29:01 AM(UTC)
mavik

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/23/2017(UTC)
Posts: 1,214
Man
Location: Germany

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 168 time(s) in 150 post(s)
+1
jpetrie  
#9 Posted : Friday, April 22, 2022 8:22:27 AM(UTC)
jpetrie

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/27/2021(UTC)
Posts: 43
Man
United States

Thanks: 50 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
+1
greggibson  
#10 Posted : Sunday, June 19, 2022 12:30:20 PM(UTC)
greggibson

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/23/2020(UTC)
Posts: 137
United States
Location: Washington, DC

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Bringing this back up again. We really need an option to disconnect an NDI source by right clicking an NDI input. Currently if you mistakenly assign an NDI source to the wrong input there is really no way to turn it off. You either have to leave it as a duplicate, assign another existing source to it, or delete it. Deleting it unravels all multiview layers with the deleted input assigned. There is no option to unassign or disconnect.

Please add an option to assign "NONE" as a source.

Thanks,

Greg
jpetrie  
#11 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2022 2:41:27 AM(UTC)
jpetrie

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/27/2021(UTC)
Posts: 43
Man
United States

Thanks: 50 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Alt. I think you can remove the source in the .vMix file (I haven't tested this) but I think it would then show as offline.

2nd alt. Broadcast a nothing NDI from the test pattern generator or like Zen's NDI router or something.
greggibson  
#12 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2022 5:30:15 AM(UTC)
greggibson

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/23/2020(UTC)
Posts: 137
United States
Location: Washington, DC

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Thanks. I know there are work arounds like running test pattern but that's not really a solution. It's logical there should be a way to turn off a source on an input.
doggy  
#13 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2022 5:36:45 AM(UTC)
doggy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/27/2012(UTC)
Posts: 5,223
Belgium
Location: Belgium

Thanks: 293 times
Was thanked: 955 time(s) in 790 post(s)
Originally Posted by: greggibson Go to Quoted Post
honestly wouldn't care if there was just a left over freeze frame.


like when one pauses the input ?

jpetrie  
#14 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2022 12:25:08 PM(UTC)
jpetrie

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/27/2021(UTC)
Posts: 43
Man
United States

Thanks: 50 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Originally Posted by: greggibson Go to Quoted Post
Thanks. I know there are work arounds like running test pattern but that's not really a solution. It's logical there should be a way to turn off a source on an input.

Granted. That's why my +1 is up there with yours. Just trying to help in the meantime, since it's not likely to be responded to or implemented any time soon. They've got their priorities and our +1's do little to change them IMO.
BETech  
#15 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2022 6:49:09 PM(UTC)
BETech

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/18/2015(UTC)
Posts: 150
Location: Australia

Thanks: 81 times
Was thanked: 109 time(s) in 71 post(s)
Originally Posted by: richardgatarski Go to Quoted Post
+1
or better, a Black or None option (the latter meaning transparent).


Agreed Richard. The Black and Alpha option is available already in the vMix software framework.

Easy to add to the NDI context menu.

No CPU/GPU or network resources required.


Huwenator  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, June 21, 2022 3:04:49 PM(UTC)
Huwenator

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/11/2021(UTC)
Posts: 6
Location: Australia

+1
Users browsing this topic
Guest (8)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.