logo

Live Production Software Forums


Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
avteam  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:42:03 AM(UTC)
avteam

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/26/2016(UTC)
Posts: 11

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
We are considering adding some PTZ cameras that are full POE for locations where getting ethernet is already available and installing lengthy video cables is problematic. I just wanted to know if there are any major downsides to do this, more so from a system performance perspective.

Current Cameras: Sony SRG-300H via HDMI
Additional Cameras being considered: Sony SRG-X120

Does the extra step of decoding the video input have any undesirable effect on vMix performance (delay, CPU increase) or is it largely transparent if you have enough hardware encoders available in your GPU?

Is an NDI camera preferable over an h.264 camera?

My biggest camera constraint beyond the cable aspect mentioned above is ensuring they support Visca-over-IP such that we can use it with our existing Sony RM-IP10 IP Camera Controller.
mjgraves  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:44:35 AM(UTC)
mjgraves

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/1/2015(UTC)
Posts: 1,151
Man
United States
Location: Houston TX

Thanks: 319 times
Was thanked: 263 time(s) in 233 post(s)
Any use of NDI is CPU intensive. It is decoded by the CPU.

H264 will have more latency than NDI-HX or full NDI.

NDI-HX has more latency than full-bandwidth NDI.
thanks 1 user thanked mjgraves for this useful post.
avteam on 1/19/2021(UTC)
avteam  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:36:04 AM(UTC)
avteam

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/26/2016(UTC)
Posts: 11

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: mjgraves Go to Quoted Post
Any use of NDI is CPU intensive. It is decoded by the CPU.

H264 will have more latency than NDI-HX or full NDI.

NDI-HX has more latency than full-bandwidth NDI.


H.264 would be preferable over NDI from a system resources perspective because the H.264 can be decoded by the GPU whereas NDI is CPU.

From a delay perspective, it sounds like NDI is preferable over h.264 streams. Any idea how much different there is in delay from NDI, H.264 and uncompressed?

Do I have that correct?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.