Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/14/2015(UTC) Posts: 55 Location: Sacramento, CA
Thanks: 8 times Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Has anyone done a comparison between using i7 vs XEON CPUs? Are there advantages or disadvantages between the two?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/10/2015(UTC) Posts: 322 Location: Siroki Brijeg Thanks: 8 times Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 24 post(s)
|
mavrick816 wrote:Has anyone done a comparison between using i7 vs XEON CPUs? Are there advantages or disadvantages between the two?
I would always go with i7 and when I talk to people how are more into that part they say i7
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/16/2013(UTC) Posts: 406 Location: Iowa Thanks: 281 times Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 29 post(s)
|
I have an ASUS P6T deluxe v2 mobo that had an i7-920 quad core processor running 2.66 GHz in it. The only i7 upgrade path for that system was complete replacement to a newer socket platform. Instead, I found a used Xeon x5680 hex core 3.33GHz processor and dropped into the old socket, then overclocked it to 3.67GHz. It is now twice as fast in benchmarks than the original I7-920 processor. It has breathed new life into my system for only $150 on ebay. vMix is no longer bringing it to its knees.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/9/2013(UTC) Posts: 261 Location: Katy, Texas
Was thanked: 37 time(s) in 37 post(s)
|
I have a Dell T7500 workstation with dual hex-core xeon X5675s (3.06Ghz) and 36GB of memory. Replaced the business class graphics card with a recommended nVidia GTX 970. It doesn't even break a sweat running vMix.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/19/2013(UTC) Posts: 600 Location: Belgium Thanks: 75 times Was thanked: 91 time(s) in 75 post(s)
|
As long as you don't need an integrated gpu (i think most vmix users don't, since they use videocards), a xeon can be the perfect choice. We run our machine off a xeon E5-2620 v3. It's running supersmooth and was the cheapest 40 lanes 6 core on the market. Beats the crap out of the i7's price whise.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/13/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,162 Location: Melbourne Thanks: 220 times Was thanked: 199 time(s) in 181 post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 9/8/2014(UTC) Posts: 68 Location: Atlanta
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 7 post(s)
|
I have an i7 3770k overclocked to 4.2Ghz and vMix can really push it. The problem with i7's like the 3770k is that they are really only 4 core CPU's. My next system is going to either be a 6 core i7 or a Xeon based system. For me, programs like vMix and Wirecast respond better with more real cores vs the fake hyperthreaded cores.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/26/2013(UTC) Posts: 148 Location: Houston, TX, US Thanks: 28 times Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
|
so may I get a clarification?
Usually I am ingesting up to 3 sources, streaming and recording program simultaneously. In my experience with vMix HD, an (older) i7 works fine (<50%).
BUT if I am using vMix-4K with the multicorder operating too, do I need/prefer multiple cores or the i7's speed?
I am using 8-16 Gig of ram and a graphics card too.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/26/2013(UTC) Posts: 148 Location: Houston, TX, US Thanks: 28 times Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
|
HWL wrote:so may I get a clarification?
Usually I am ingesting up to 3 sources, streaming and recording program simultaneously. In my experience with vMix HD, an (older) i7 works fine (<50%).
BUT if I am using vMix-4K with the multicorder operating too, do I need/prefer multiple cores or the i7's speed?
I am using 8-16 Gig of ram and a graphics card too.
Thanks BUMP ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/7/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,636 Location: Canada Thanks: 33 times Was thanked: 506 time(s) in 475 post(s)
|
@ HWL I would suggest that you are better served with a higher end processor when placing demands on the CPU with processes such as encoding and recording, but that is not to say that older and/or lesser processors will not perform satisfactorily (depending on what you are doing and for how long) especially when pared with a newer high-end NVidea card that can assume some of those processing tasks: http://forums.vmix.com/d...ts&m=20150#post20150So, a lot depends on your "standards" of what is acceptable or desirable from a performance standpoint. There is nothing wrong with pushing a 'System' to the limit once in a while, but no 'System' will remain stable in that condition for an indefinite period of time. If you need a reliable "workhorse" that can tackle anything you throw at it with vMix, then I would look at getting your 'System' to do what you are currently doing at less than 10% CPU usage. If you are content with running at 50% or less and don't mind pushing it to 80% or 90% periodically, then you will probably be able to get by with what you've got, provided you're not doing it for hours on end. Not sure if that really answers your question, but what you "need" can be different from what you "prefer", since preference is somewhat subjective. The bottom line is, though, that higher end components will yield better long term results. Ice
|
1 user thanked IceStream for this useful post.
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
Important Information:
The vMix Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
More Details
Close