logo

Live Production Software Forums


Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Ryzen6667  
#1 Posted : Monday, May 29, 2023 3:54:09 PM(UTC)
Ryzen6667

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/27/2021(UTC)
Posts: 14
Netherlands

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I often find that the MP4 hardware encoder HEVC gives very ugly encoding artifacts in darker smooth gradient areas like walls or other background surfaces.
I have noticed with the h264-high these artifacts are not present.

But I decided to test the H264 hardware encoding vs HEVC hardware encoding.
As probably everybody knows HEVC should give around 40% bitrate savings for the same quality or better quality at the same bitrate.
Results I found where incredibly bad.
Not only does the H264 encoding trade blows with the HEVC in quality, the HEVC actually uses more bitrate then the H264 to get that result, its like the world in reverse.
HEVC give a bigger file with the same bitrate specified in Vmix and does not give a better-quality encoded result.

Vmix please fix this hardware encoding or update the ffmpeg so we can make our own profiles.

Give us some parameter control of the hardware encoder instead of only the option to turn it on or off.
Also LLHQ is often not the desired profile.

For all the people who use the MP4 hardware encoder please give this post a like to help this issue get attention because the forum is full of dead topics related to this.

Testing was done on a rtx a6000 and replicated on a 4090. Driver 531.14 W10
Output 1 was set to: HEVC 60 fps 4K 32mbps – Final output size 128mb
Output 2 was set to: H264-high 60fps 4K 32mbps – Final output size 108mb
MSU VQMT was used with the “Netflix” VMAF 0.6.3 4K as video quality measurement
Tested Vmix version 26.0.0.44 & 25.0.0.34

2021 LG OLED l Ink Art 4K HDR 60fps_H264High - 29 05 2023 - 07-05-17 - Output 1_HEVC - 29 05 2023 - 07-05-17_vmaf.png (1,064kb) downloaded 9 time(s).
admin  
#2 Posted : Monday, May 29, 2023 5:30:12 PM(UTC)
admin

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administrators
Joined: 1/13/2010(UTC)
Posts: 5,228
Man
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Was thanked: 4332 time(s) in 1528 post(s)
Hi,

I would suggest contacting vMix support, as we are not able to replicate this behaviour.
https://www.vmix.com/contact-us.aspx

Note that MP4 recording in vMix (for both H264 and HEVC) does not use FFMPEG and does not use LLHQ.
It uses the Media Foundation encoder provided by the NVIDIA driver, and uses the recommended encoding settings of that encoder.

Regards,

Martin
vMix

thanks 1 user thanked admin for this useful post.
eduardocfs on 5/29/2023(UTC)
Ryzen6667  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, May 31, 2023 1:06:02 AM(UTC)
Ryzen6667

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/27/2021(UTC)
Posts: 14
Netherlands

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: admin Go to Quoted Post
Hi,

I would suggest contacting vMix support, as we are not able to replicate this behaviour.
https://www.vmix.com/contact-us.aspx

Note that MP4 recording in vMix (for both H264 and HEVC) does not use FFMPEG and does not use LLHQ.
It uses the Media Foundation encoder provided by the NVIDIA driver, and uses the recommended encoding settings of that encoder.

Regards,

Martin
vMix



Hey martin, i have contacted support indeed but let me better show my issue because its not a machine thing.
Just an encoding thing, my guess is turning adaptive quantization on will solve the issue.

Btw thanks for the explanation about the Media Foundation encoder, i will dive some into this but i guess AQ is off and probably also at a sort of quick, fast and dirty profile what was recommended.
Is the encoding of the Stream output also with this media foundation encoder or does that use the FFMPEG?

Below is a picture with reverse colour contrast to make it really clear what I mean with compression encoding artifacting in the banding of gradients.
This was a recording i had at hand but it gets worse with darker gradents.
A picture cannot really explain how annoying this is in video since it's constantly in motion like noise bands of x16 or x8 macroblocks, so I hope you download the video below to see that.
You see the person talking but the background although somewhat blurred because of depth of field its continuously moving in bands and blocks around and it is not a bitrate related issue.
Negative contrast banding in encoding.png (2,068kb) downloaded 3 time(s).
here the link to a small part of the recording, its a part muxed out so to keep file size compact but no transcode so its straight out of the vmix encode.
https://drive.google.com...e5kz/view?usp=share_link (need to download ofcourse for proper play)

And no, its not feasible/practical and unnecessary to do intra frame 4x 4k feeds recordings that last 1 - 3 hours every day should anyone recommend this.

Also to replicate the strange encoding behaviour that i noticed in the encoder here is the short reel that makes the recording size and results very unbalanced.
https://drive.google.com...Mjuk/view?usp=share_link
After this i tested a whole lot of other video's with mixed results, some as you would expect and some more closer in result to encoding this video.
But i welcome everyone to test it out, it's just an short showreel but seems to impact the encoder greatly in h264 vs hevc.
Especially in 4k 60fps recording while you expect at higher resolution hevc would normally get a bigger advantage on h264.
Ryzen6667  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, May 31, 2023 3:32:58 AM(UTC)
Ryzen6667

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/27/2021(UTC)
Posts: 14
Netherlands

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
To be fair i would be more then content using ffmpeg with a custom encode profile and arguments in the xml as it is now for recording, But since it is so outdated it does not recognize a lot of the newer arguments.
With that i mean for example the presets p1 t/m 7, lookahead function, temporal and spatial quantization, B-frames and advanced VBR mode.

I did a own ffmpeg build but for some reason when the recording starts it freezes for 16 seconds or something and total record time is way off and strange.
admin  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, May 31, 2023 3:45:55 AM(UTC)
admin

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administrators
Joined: 1/13/2010(UTC)
Posts: 5,228
Man
Location: Gold Coast, Australia

Was thanked: 4332 time(s) in 1528 post(s)
Hi,

Unfortunately I think the expectations are bit too high to expect from live encoding software.
I did run some quick tests on the LG reels at both h264 and hevc @ 25Mbps and could not see anything out of the ordinary, even zooming in 4x.

In fact it goes to show how much optimisation NVIDIA has done to their H264 encoder in recent years!

Not too long ago, semi-professional camcorders recorded HD H264 @ 25Mbps.
Now we have real time encoders like NVENC achieving better quality at 4K60 at almost the same bitrates!

Sure, there are might be some tweaks to be had to deal with edge cases like this, but I think those options are better left to encoding
tools more specialised for ultra high quality encodings.

Regards,

Martin
vMix
thanks 2 users thanked admin for this useful post.
eduardocfs on 5/31/2023(UTC), dasmedienatelier on 6/5/2023(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.