Rank: Newbie
Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/17/2020(UTC) Posts: 1
|
What is the difference in connecting a capture card by cpu or chipset? why connecting via chipset is not recommended?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 9/10/2015(UTC) Posts: 133 Thanks: 2 times Was thanked: 35 time(s) in 32 post(s)
|
PCIe lanes all ultimately go to the CPU. Your motherboard has certain features that need to connect to PCIe lanes but it doesn't always need a full set (like say 4 of them).
To not waste lanes the motherboard manufacturer will use 4 lanes to connect the chipset, connect things like the LAN port and maybe the onboard audio, and then pass the remaining bandwidth to a PCIe port (4 lanes). Even though you have "4 lanes" it's not getting the full bandwidth and lowest latency possible compared to that capture card connecting directly to the CPU.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/29/2015(UTC) Posts: 135 Location: Seattle Wa
Thanks: 16 times Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
|
newer boards like Z790 have more lanes and bandwith to the cpu, via the chipset. But your best bet is allways direct to cpu. you can do thunderbolt, but thats running through the chipset on most boards anyways. i have a Z590 and running via thunderbolt a Avermedia Live Gamer Bolt, it works fine. USB Capture devices are going to go through the chipset, unless you add in a usb card, that goes to the cpu via the pcie lanes, but some pcie lanes goto the chipset, all matters on the board you buy, The most exspensive, gives you the most versatility.
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
Important Information:
The vMix Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
More Details
Close